MGTC44 

Int'l Business Management

A 3rd year undergraduatecourse in the Division of Management,  University of Toronto at Scarborough
.updated 2003 Oct 30 (includes some questions on the Oct test 1)
.
SectionA SectionB. SectionC. SectionD. SectionE. SectionF. SectionG.
.
Some students expressed an interest in seeing examples of previous test and exam questions. I have decided in the interests of "good teaching" to provide some examples for you here. You may, or may not find this helpful. Some questions cannot be shown here because , obviously, eg. there are only so many ways you can ask about the IMF. You should study the topics in question so that you "UNDERSTAND" what the topic is about, then, no matter how the question is worded, you will be able to provide a good answer.

Good answers deserving of an "A", are answers that are neatly written so one can read your words - if one cannot read the words you write, then it is fair to say you cannot get a mark for the particular point. You should also read the question carefully and write what is being asked for - my personal penchant is to ask you to explain the "reasons why" certain things exist, not just memorize static facts about the topic. I also like students to be able to link things together so that they can make a connection , for example, between the influencing environments, FDI, globalization etc.

I'm also very keen on students being able to answer questions using an example from the real world of international business. Teaching theories and asking for students to recite facts is not as helpful as putting that into the context of a real situation which will help the student understand why they are being taught a particular point. In order to be able to answer a question using a real example therefore requires that you know some real examples - therefore you must read a national newspaper on a regular basis so that you will have some "examples in hand" if a question calls for that, eg. "explain complications of attracting FDI with an example of a real company that was enticed to invest in Canada"
 
The following where questions asked on previous  "Test # 1" tests
- it is not likely these questions will be asked again
- they are provided here so that you may see examples of how questions are worded and the degree of difficulty

This was question at the end of Test #1 and designed to test knowledge of current events and the ability to "apply" what we have discussed thus far in the context of a current event.
Subject: U.S. – Canada relations.
In several Canadian newspapers, (end of the 2nd week and beginning of the 3rd week of October 2003) there were stories carried about the APEC summit in Thailand. In a story carried in the Toronto Star on Monday Oct 20th there was an article about President Bush further pushing his agenda and P.M. Chretien was noted for using his meeting with China’s President Hu to discuss something important.


 
The following where questions asked on previous Mid-term tests
- it is not likely these questions will be asked again
- they are provided here so that you may see examples of how questions are worded and the degree of difficulty

 
The following where questions asked on previous Final Exams
First, it would make sense to begin the answer by defining what TQM and Kaizen is - worth 2 marks
Secondly, it would be sharp for the student to point out that these considerations are part of globalization and an increasingly competitive marketplace where customers are offered an increasing array of products at ever lower prices
Third it would be wise to note that although TQM and Kaizen are good things to try to achieve, they come from Japanese business practices which work best in a homogenous culture and there have been problems adopting them to a multi-cultural North American workforce.
Fourth - the Japanese economy, after the U.S. economy, is the most dynamic in the Western World and some of things they have done to develop their business competitively would obviously be of interest to North Americans and Europeans